We study the way in which SEC restrictions on fund manager compensation aff
ect portfolio choice when investors buy into funds whose recent performance
has been good. We find that fund managers choose riskier portfolios than t
hey would if there were no contracting restrictions and that these portfoli
os are riskier than the optimal risky portfolio. Further, if investors choo
se funds according to performance rank rather than Performance relative to
the average, these effects are exacerbated-fund managers choose even riskie
r portfolios. Thus, our analysis suggests a need to provide investors with
information about risk-adjusted performance.