T. Kameda et al., CENTRALITY IN SOCIOCOGNITIVE NETWORKS AND SOCIAL-INFLUENCE - AN ILLUSTRATION IN A GROUP DECISION-MAKING CONTEXT, Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(2), 1997, pp. 296-309
Social influence in consensus formation was examined using a notion of
sociocognitive network. Given the robustness of shared information in
determining group decisions, the authors propose the concept of a soc
iocognitive network that captures the degree of members' knowledge-sha
ring prior to group interaction. A link connecting a given pair of mem
bers represents the amount of information that the pair shares before
interaction. As in a regular social network, a member's status can be
defined by the centrality in the network; the more information a membe
r shares with others, the more cognitively central the member is in th
e group. The authors hypothesized that a cognitively central member wo
uld acquire pivotal power in a group and exert more influence on conse
nsus than would peripheral members, independently of the member's pref
erence majority or minority status The results of two studies supporte
d these predictions.