In recent years there have been numerous proposals for punitive damage refo
rm. Proponents of such reform have often asserted that punitive damages are
both common and exorbitant. In this Article, Professor Vidmar and Dr. Rose
examine the validity of these and other empirical claims about punitive da
mages. They do so by studying punitive damage awards reported in the Florid
a Jury Verdict Reporter. Ultimately, they conclude that there is no empiric
al support for the claims made by proponents of tort reform in Florida.