Present hepatitis B vaccines use multidose prolonged regimens, which even h
ealthcare workers at risk do not always complete. Moreover, when vaccinatio
n is completed there remain some who fail to achieve adequate protection. T
he protection of adults at risk could be improved if there were a more pote
nt vaccine and/or a shorter vaccination regimen available. Vaccine-naive ad
ults were randomized to vaccination with either Engerix-B (SmithKline Biolo
gicals, Rixensart, Belgium) or a novel triple antigen (S, pre-S1, and preS2
) recombinant vaccine (Hepacare; Medeva Pharma Plc, Speke, UK). The primary
efficacy parameter was the degree of seroprotection 6 or 7 months (26 +/-
2 weeks) after beginning vaccination, A total of 304 adults entered the stu
dy. Of these, 16 failed to complete the study (9 on Hepacare and 7 on Enger
ix-B). With the Engerix-B standard (0, 1, 6) regimen, 88% of subjects were
protected by month 7, whereas with the triple antigen vaccine a 2-dose regi
men (0, 1) provided equivalent protection (91%) within 6 months and a 3-dos
e (0, 1, 6) regimen was significantly superior (98% seroprotected by 7 mont
hs after starting vaccination P < mi). with adults at risk for a suboptimal
response (i.e., older adults, the obese, men, and smokers) the triple anti
gen vaccine produced a greater degree of protection. The vaccines had simil
ar safety profiles. Both vaccines were well tolerated. In healthy normal ad
ults, a triple antigen hepatitis B vaccine containing S and pre-S antigens
produced an enhanced immunologic response and was as effective as a 2- and
3-dose regimen.