Variability in handwriting styles suggests that many letter recognition eng
ines cannot correctly identify some hand-written letters of poor quality at
reasonable computational cost. Methods that are capable of searching the r
esulting sparse graph of letter candidates are therefore required. The meth
od presented here employs 'wildcards' to represent missing letter candidate
s. Multiple experts are used to represent different aspects of handwriting.
Each expert evaluates closeness of match and indicates its confidence. Exp
lanation experts determine the degree to which the word alternative under c
onsideration explains extraneous letter candidates. Schemata for normalisat
ion and combination of scores are investigated and their performance compar
ed. Hill-climbing yields near-optimal combination weights that outperform c
omparable methods on identical dynamic handwriting data.