Early ovarian cancer (stages IA-IIA) accounts for 30% of all epithelial ova
rian cancer. Even if relatively uncommon, when "high risk" patients are con
sidered, it is lethal in 25-30% of the cases. Mainstay of treatment is surg
ery followed by either adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy when indicated
on the basis of still debatable prognostic factors. Literature data show a
great variability in survival rate due to the great heterogeneity of patie
nts considered in different reports and few randomized trials affected by a
consequent low power. Italian groups have contributed both in investigatin
g the role of surgery and of chemo or radiotherapy in the treatment of this
disease.
An important contribution in surgery has been made by Italian institutions
in reducing the extent of surgery in young patients wishing to retain their
reproductive capability showing that a "conservative surgery" (unilateral
oophorectomy) can be safely performed in initial stages without affecting t
he probability of cure. Another important surgical topic investigated by It
alian institutions concerns the role of lymphadenectomy. In early ovarian c
ancer the node involvement ranges between 14-24% in stage I and 37-50% in s
tage II. Although the node positivity rate detectable by sampling (SA) is l
ower than the one shown by a systematic procedure (LY), no data at the mome
nt show that patients undergoing a sampling evaluation have a poorer progno
sis. From 1992 through 1994, 202 patients (SA: 99; LY: 103) were enrolled b
y six Italian institutions in a randomized trial aimed to assess the diagno
stic and therapeutic role of SA vs. LY in early stage ovarian cancer. Posit
ive nodes were detected in 9.9% vs. 19.3% respectively as well as a differe
nt proportion of intra/perioperative complications occurred. No difference
in time to relapse nor in overall survival were detected in the two groups
showing no evidence of efficacy in favor of extensive staging of the retrop
eritoneum.
From 1983 to 1990, 271 stage I ovarian cancer patients entered two prospect
ive multicentric randomized trials conducted by Italian institutions. Trial
I compared cisplatin (50 mg/m(2), six cycles repeated every 28 days) vs. n
o further treatment in stage IA-B grade 2-3 patients; Trial II compared the
same dose and schedule of cisplatin vs. intraperitoneal P-32 in stage IC p
atients. Cisplatin significantly reduced the relapse rate by 65% in Trial I
and by 61% in Trial II, but survival was not affected (Trial I: HR = 1.15,
95% CI = 0.44-2.98; Trial II: HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.37-1.43). The final co
nclusion drawn by these two important Italian studies was that adjuvant cis
platin treatment in early ovarian cancer prevents relapse although the impa
ct of chemotherapy remains unclear. For this reason two international trial
s have been performed (ICON1 and ACTION) aimed at assessing the role of pla
tinum-based chemotherapy on survival. Italian collaboration in both trials
has been important, including about half of the total number of the 900 ran
domized patients. Results will probably be available during this year and a
re expected with a great interest by the whole scientific international com
munity.