THE SUCCESS OF ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHRODESIS ADJACENT TO A PREVIOUS FUSION

Citation
As. Hilibrand et al., THE SUCCESS OF ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHRODESIS ADJACENT TO A PREVIOUS FUSION, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 22(14), 1997, pp. 1574-1579
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics,"Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
03622436
Volume
22
Issue
14
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1574 - 1579
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(1997)22:14<1574:TSOACA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Study Design. A retrospective review of all patients surgically treate d for adjacent segment disease of the cervical spine over a 20-year pe riod. Ojectives. To determine the clinical and radiographic success of discectomy with interbody grafting and corpectomy with strut grafting in the treatment of adjacent segment disease of the cervical spine. S ummary of Background Data. Up to 25% of all patients undergoing anteri or cervical fusion have new disease due to degeneration of an adjacent segment within 10 years. The success of surgical treatment in these p atients with adjacent segment disease has not been reported. Methods. Thirty-eight patients were surgically treated for adjacent segment dis ease by discectomy with interbody grafting or corpectomy with strut gr afting. Arthrodesis was evaluated by flexion-extension lateral radiogr aphs and clinical outcomes were assessed using Robinson's criteria at least 2 years after surgery. Fusion rates were compared by Fisher's ex act test, and outcomes were compared by rank-sum analysis. Results. Th e rate of arthrodesis was significantly lower in the 24 patients treat ed by discectomy with interbody grafting at one or more levels (63%) t han in the 14 patients treated by corpectomy with strut grafting (100% ; P = 0.01). Clinical outcomes were similar for the corpectomy and dis cectomy groups (P = 0.55). There was a trend toward better outcomes in patients who achieved a solid arthrodesis (P = 0.13). Conclusions. Ac hieving fusion is more difficult when anterior cervical arthrodesis is performed adjacent to a prior fusion. Strut grafting resulted in a si gnificantly higher rate of arthrodesis than interbody grafting.