How do people evaluate their degree of mastery over a task? A series of fou
r studies demonstrated that a potentially irrelevant cue can have a strong
influence on such evaluations. In these studies, the total amount of work g
iven to participants (the problem set size) influenced both (a) the amount
of work participants completed before feeling that they had performed well
and were adequately prepared for a related future task, and (b) participant
s' assessments of their performance and their feelings of preparedness for
a related future task. These effects occurred even when a randomization pro
cedure was used to emphasize the arbitrary nature of the problem set size.
The effects vanished, however, when participants were given extra time to e
valuate their progress after completing each problem. Copyright (C) 2001 Jo
hn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.