Colorado family physicians' knowledge of hereditary breast cancer and related practice

Citation
J. Mouchawar et al., Colorado family physicians' knowledge of hereditary breast cancer and related practice, J CANCER ED, 16(1), 2001, pp. 33-37
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION
ISSN journal
08858195 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
33 - 37
Database
ISI
SICI code
0885-8195(200121)16:1<33:CFPKOH>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Background. The objective of this study was to describe Colorado family phy sicians' (FPs') knowledge of hereditary breast cancer and related practice behaviors. Method. A survey was mailed to 400 practicing FPs randomly sampl ed from the board-certified members of the Colorado Academy of Family physi cians. Results. Overall, knowledge of hereditary breast cancer was inadequa te. Less than half of the respondents knew that BRCA mutations account for 0-10% of all breast cancers; 38% knew the lifetime risk for non-carriers, a nd 17% responded that a known carrier would have a lifetime breast cancer r isk of 50%. just 45% knew that a BRCA1 mutation could pass from father to d aughter. Similarly, only half reported an increased ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 carriers, and an increased risk for male breast cancer for BRCA2 car riers. All respondents reported that taking a family cancer history was par t of their regular clinical practices. The majority reported having referre d no patient for cancer genetic counseling or testing within the prior year , with only two reporting having ordered BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing within the year. There was no significant sociodemographic or knowledge difference bet ween the physicians who reported referring patients and the others (p > 0.0 5). There was interest in learning more about hereditary breast cancer, wit h rural physicians requesting Internet and teleconference courses. Conclusi ons. As cancer genetics emerges into the primary care arena. FPs recognize their knowledge deficit in this area. Future cancer genetic outreach for pr imary care providers statewide is necessary and would be welcomed, and may require a variety of educational and consultative approaches, depending on geographic location of practice.