Phase II clinical investigation of gemcitabine in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and window evaluation of dose rate on gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation

Citation
Sr. Patel et al., Phase II clinical investigation of gemcitabine in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and window evaluation of dose rate on gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation, J CL ONCOL, 19(15), 2001, pp. 3483-3489
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
0732183X → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
15
Year of publication
2001
Pages
3483 - 3489
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-183X(20010801)19:15<3483:PICIOG>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and optimal dose rate of gemci tabine in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) by compar ing levels of gemcitabine triphosphate (GTP) in peripheral-blood mononuclea r cells (PBMCs) of patients receiving two different dose rates. Patients and Methods: Fifty-six assessable patients with STS (17 gastrointe stinal [GI] leiomyosarcomas and 39 other histologies) were treated on a two -arm phase 11 study. Gemcitabine was given at 1 g/m(2) as a 30-minute infus ion weekly for up to 7 weeks followed by I week of rest and reassessment of tumor. Subsequent cycles were given at 1 g/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks followe d by 1 week of rest. Nine patients underwent cellular pharmacologic studies at two different dose rates (1 g/m(2) over a standard 30-minute infusion o n week I and over pharmacologically based infusion of 150 minutes on week 2 ) to evaluate GTP levels in PBMCs. Results: Seven partial responses were noted among 39 patients, for an overa ll response rate of 18% (95% confidence interval, 7% to 29%). Median durati on of response was 3.5 months (range, 2 to 13 months). Four of 10 patients with non-GI leiomyosarcomas achieved a partial response. No objective respo nses were noted in 17 patients with GI leiomyosarcomas. One patient had a m ixed response. Median time to progression for all patients (both arms) was 3 months; median survival was 13.9 months. Treatment was generally well tol erated. Comparison of cellular pharmacology demonstrated a significant 1.4- fold increase in the concentration of GTP with the 150-minute infusion. Conclusion: Given the limited therapeutic armamentarium for STS, the activi ty of gemcitabine is encouraging. Its potential for combination therapy in the salvage setting should be studied with pharmacologically guided fixed d ose-rate infusion.