Ja. Sloan et al., A simple stratification factor prognostic for survival in advanced cancer:The Good/Bad/Uncertain index, J CL ONCOL, 19(15), 2001, pp. 3539-3546
Purpose: This article summarizes the third step of a research program to id
entify variables that supplement the predictive power of the the Eastern Co
operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) for survival. The o
bjective was to produce a simple, practical, stratification factor for phas
e III oncology clinical trials involving patients with advanced malignant d
isease.
Patients and Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 729 patients with
metastatic colorectal or lung cancers. Patients provided a Karnofsky index
and appetite rating while physicians provided a survival estimate and the
ECOG-PS. Scores for each item were categorized as having a positive, neutra
l, or negative indication for survival. A patient was classified as having
a relatively good prognosis if three or more of the four items showed a pos
itive indication, a bad prognosis if three or more items were negative, and
an uncertain prognosis otherwise (Good/Bad/Uncertain [GBU] index).
Results: The GBU index improved on the prognostic power of a Cox model quar
tile index and PS alone and increased the accuracy of survival classificati
on estimates by 5% to 10% more than ECOG-PS alone. For patients with PS of
0 or 1, significant survival patterns exist between GBU groups (P = .002 an
d .0001, respectively).
Conclusion: The GBU index may be recommended as a supplementary stratificat
ion factor for certain future phase III trials in metastatic lung or colore
ctal cancer where patient heterogeneity is a particular concern. The GBU re
presents a relatively modest increase to the cost and patient burden of a c
linical trial given the additional control that is achieved over the potent
ially confounding concomitant to the treatment variable.