A proficiency testing scheme for aromatic hydrocarbons in air by the manual thermal desorption-GC method: a comparison of laboratory performance withthe uncertainty requirements of the European Union Ambient Air Directive
Pr. Stacey et Md. Wright, A proficiency testing scheme for aromatic hydrocarbons in air by the manual thermal desorption-GC method: a comparison of laboratory performance withthe uncertainty requirements of the European Union Ambient Air Directive, J ENVIR MON, 3(4), 2001, pp. 425-431
The Workplace Analysis Scheme for Proficiency (WASP) is a proficiency testi
ng scheme for the analysis of occupational hygiene and environmental air sa
mples and is operated in the UK by the Health and Safety Laboratory. Since
1997, WASP has offered samples of benzene, toluene and m-xylene, at environ
mental levels on Tenax, and has about 35 laboratories participating, mostly
from industry, local government and consultancy organisations in the UK. T
he results reported cover the first 10 rounds of the environmental analytes
(1997-1999) and demonstrate the important role of proficiency testing in a
ssessing the quality of laboratory performance. Estimates are obtained for
within-laboratory precision and the total variability at each analyte level
. The estimates of within-laboratory precision suggest that laboratories ha
ve more difficulty analysing toluene and m-xylene than benzene. Linear rela
tionships for the reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDT) with l
oading level are evident for the analytes at occupational levels. At enviro
nmental levels, the relationship between loading level and reproducibility
is much less well defined. The standard deviation for the proficiency testi
ng assessment for all three analytes at the environmental level is 14%, as
derived from the benzene data. Expanded uncertainty estimates (k = 1.96), f
or the analysis of samples since the scheme started, are obtained from the
average total variance, and are 27% for benzene, 39% for toluene and 36% fo
r m-xylene. Although the linear trend of performance against round number w
as not significant at the 95% level of confidence (p = 0.23 for benzene, p
= 0.3 for toluene and p = 0.32 for m-xylene), there was a general improveme
nt in RSDT from 26-34% to about 8-13% 10 rounds later. Currently, for a lab
oratory to meet one of the data quality objectives in the Ambient Air Direc
tive (indicative measurement of benzene, expanded uncertainty +/- 30% or le
ss), it would have to achieve a level of analytical performance to satisfy
the category 1 (best performance) limit of better than +/-8.8%. In the last
proficiency testing round, discussed in this paper, only 58% of laboratori
es obtained performance scores that indicated that they were able to consis
tently achieve this level of performance.