OBJECTIVES: To compare the satisfaction and knowledge of patients who have
their warfarin managed by their physician or by a multidisciplinary, teleph
one-based anticoagulation service (ACS) and to assess referring physicians'
satisfaction with the ACS.
DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed 300 patients taking warfarin (mean age
73 years): 150 at health centers randomized to have access to an ACS, and
150 at control health centers without ACS access. We also surveyed 17 physi
cians who refer patients to the ACS.
SETTING: Eight outpatient health centers in Missouri and Southern Illinois.
MEASUREMENTS: We asked patients about the timeliness of international norma
lized ratio (INR) monitoring, perceived safety of warfarin, overall satisfa
ction with their warfarin management, and knowledge of what a high INR mean
t. We asked physicians at ACS-available health centers how many minutes the
y saved per INR by referring patients to the ACS, their satisfaction with t
he ACS, and their willingness to recommend the ACS to a colleague.
MAIN RESULTS: As compared with patients at control health centers, patients
at ACS-available health centers were more satisfied with the timeliness of
getting blood test results (mean 4.31 vs 4.03, P = .02), were more likely
to know what a safe INR value was (45% vs 15%, P = .001), and felt safer ta
king warfarin (mean 5.7 vs 5.2, P = .04). Physicians reported that using th
e ACS saved, on average, four minutes of their time and 13 minutes of their
staff's time, per INR. An physicians recommended use of the ACS to a colle
ague and were highly satisfied with the ACS.
CONCLUSIONS: A telephone-based ACS can be endorsed by primary-care physicia
ns and Improve patients' satisfaction with and knowledge about their antith
rombotic therapy.