Background and aim of the study: The study aim was to elucidate the advanta
ges and limitations of the homograft aortic valve for aortic valve replacem
ent over a 29-year period.
Methods: Between December 1969 and December 1998, 1,022 patients (males 65%
; median age 49 years; range: 1-80 years) received either a subcoronary (n
= 635), an intraluminal cylinder (n = 35), or a full root replacement (n =
352). There was a unique result of a 99.3% complete follow up at the end of
this 29-year experience. Between 1969 and 1975, homografts were antibiotic
-sterilized and 4 degreesC stored (124 grafts); thereafter, all homografts
were cryopreserved under a rigid protocol with only minor variations over t
he subsequent 23 years. Concomitant surgery (25%) was primarily coronary ar
tery bypass grafting (CABG; n = 110) and mitral valve surgery (n = 55). The
most common risk factor was acute (active) endocarditis (n = 92; 9%), and
patients were in NYHA class II (n 513), III (n = 256), IV (n = 112) or V (n
= 7).
Results: The 30-day/hospital mortality was 3% overall, falling to 1.13 +/-
1.0% for the 352 homograft root replacements. Actuarial late survival at 25
years of the total cohort was 19 +/- 7%. Early endocarditis occurred in tw
o of the 1,022 patient cohort, and freedom from late infection (34 patients
) actuarially at 20 years was 89%. One-third of these patients were medical
ly cured of their endocarditis. Preservation methods ( 4 degreesC or cryopr
eservation) and implantation techniques displayed no difference in the over
all actuarial 20-year incidence of late survival endocarditis, thromboembol
ism or structural degeneration requiring operation. Thromboembolism occurre
d in 55 patients (35 permanent, 20 transient) with an actuarial 15-year fre
edom in the 861 patients having aortic valve replacement +/- CABG surgery o
f 92% and in the 105 patients having additional mitral valve surgery of 75%
(p = 0.000). Freedom from reoperation from all causes was 50% at 20 years
and was independent of valve preservation. Freedom from reoperation for str
uctural deterioration was very patient age-dependent. For all cryopreserved
valves, at 15 years, the freedom was 47% (0-20-year-old patients at operat
ion), 85% (21-40 years), 81% (41-60 years) and 94% (> 60 years). Root repla
cement versus subcoronary implantation reduced the technical causes for reo
peration and re-replacement (p 0.0098).
Conclusion: This largest, longest and most complete follow up demonstrates
the excellent advantages of the homograft aortic valve for the treatment of
acute endocarditis and for use in the 20+ year-old patient. However, young
patients (less than or equal to 20 years) experienced only a 47% freedom f
rom reoperation from structural degeneration at 10 years such that alternat
ive valve devices are indicated in this age group. The overall position of
the homograft in relationship to other devices is presented.