Evaluation of the traumatic coma data bank computed tomography classification for severe head injury

Citation
Pe. Vos et al., Evaluation of the traumatic coma data bank computed tomography classification for severe head injury, J NEUROTRAU, 18(7), 2001, pp. 649-655
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
ISSN journal
08977151 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
649 - 655
Database
ISI
SICI code
0897-7151(200107)18:7<649:EOTTCD>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
This study determines the interrater and intrarater reliability of the Trau matic Coma Data Bank (TCDB) computed tomography (CT) scan classification fo r severe head injury. This classification grades the severity of the injury as follows: I = normal, II = diffuse injury, III = diffuse injury with swe lling, IV = diffuse injury with shift, V = mass lesion surgically evacuated , or VI = mass lesion not operated. Patients with severe closed head injury were included. Outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at 3 and 6 months. Four observers, two of them classifying the scans twice, independently evaluated CT scans. Of the initial CT scans of 63 patients ( 36 males, 27 females; age, 34 +/- 24 years), 6.3% were class I, 26.9% class II, 28.6% class III, 6.3% class IV, 22.2% were class V, and 9.6% class VI. The overall interrater and intrarater reliability was 0.80 and 0.85, respe ctively. Separate analyses resulted in higher inter- and intrarater reliabi lities for the mass lesion categories (V and VI), 0.94 and 0.91, respective ly, than the diffuse categories (I-IV) 0.71 and 0.67. Merging category III with IV, and V with VI resulted in inter- and intrarater reliabilities of 0 .93 and 0.78, respectively. Glasgow outcome scores after 6 months were as f ollows: 19 dead (30%), one vegetative (2%), five severely disabled (8%), 17 moderately disabled (27%), and 21 good recovery (33%). Association measure s (Sommers' D) between CT and GOS scores were statistically significant for all observers. This study shows a high intra- and interobserver agreement in the assessment of CT scan abnormalities and confirms the predictive powe r on outcome when the TCDB classification is used.