F. Bracci et al., Preliminary report of electrogastrography in pediatric gastroresection: Can it be predictive of alteration of gastric motility?, J PED SURG, 36(8), 2001, pp. 1157-1159
Background/Purpose: Gastric resection is an infrequent surgical procedure i
n childhood. However, the use of the stomach for bladder augmentation and s
ubstitution is well documented. Partial gastrectomy performed in gastrocyst
oplasty (GCP) involves the greater curvature of the stomach, the same area
in which gastric pace-maker cells are known to be placed. The aim of this s
tudy was to assess, by electrogastrography (EGG), if subtotal gastric resec
tion can alter gastric motility in children submitted to partial gastrectom
y for GCP.
Methods: Gastric electrical activity (GEA) was evaluated in 25 children usi
ng EGG: 10 patients (4 boys, 6 girls; mean age, 11.6 years) previously subm
itted to GCP, and 15 normal subjects (12 boys, 3 girls; mean age, 8.62 +/-2
.77 years) as controls. All patients were submitted to cutaneous EGG; recor
ding GEA for 30 minutes before and after a standard test meal. The percenta
ge of 3 cycles per minute (3CPM), bradygastria, tachygastria, DFIC (dominan
t frequency instability coefficient), DPIC (dominant power instability coef
ficient), PDP (period dominant power), PDF (period dominant frequency) were
recorded and analyzed using Wilcoxon matched-pair test. Data were consider
ed statistically significant if P <.05.
Results: Normal subjects as well as operated patients showed a statisticall
y significant difference in bradygastria (P =.05), PDP and PDF (P =.05) per
centage, comparing pre versus postprandial period. In the normal group, 3CP
M (P =.0012) and DFIC (P =.0008) were statistically different between the p
re- and postprandial period. Patients who underwent GCP did not show any st
atistically significant difference in 3CPM and DFIC pre- and postprandial.
Conclusions: In normal subjects, GEA showed a complete variation after the
meal, whereas in operated patients GEA was impaired and only partially modi
fied after the meal. This observation suggests that in patients with gastri
c resection, adaptation of the stomach to food ingestion is present but inc
omplete with respect to normal subjects; it can be caused by surgical remov
al of the pace-maker cells of the greater-curvature. For this reason a foll
ow-up analysis of gastric function is recommended for all patients undergoi
ng GCP. J Pediatr Surg 36:1157-1159. Copyright (C) 2001 by W.B. Saunders Co
mpany.