The authors critique C. A. Bo vers' argument that education for sustainabil
ity must be inspired by the practices of pre-modern cultures, and cannot be
promoted through the postmodern pragmatism of Richard Rorty. Environmental
education must rather be grounded in contemporary cultural practice. Altho
ugh Rorty, like many other postmodernists, has shown little concern for the
ecological crisis, his approach is potentially applicable to it. What is r
equired is a broadening of focus: the ecological crisis is a crisis of post
-Enlightenment humanism as well as of other aspects of modernity.