Rf. Hoedemaeker et al., Pathologic features of prostate cancer found at population-based screeningwith a four-year interval, J NAT CANC, 93(15), 2001, pp. 1153-1158
Background: The currently recommended frequency for prostate-specific antig
en (PSA) screening tests for prostate cancer is I year, but the optimal scr
eening interval is not known. Our goal was to determine if a longer interva
l would compromise the detection of curable prostate cancer. Methods: A coh
ort of 4491 men aged 55-75 years, all participants in the Rotterdam section
of the European Randomized Study of (population-based) Screening for Prost
ate Cancer, were invited to participate in an initial PSA screening. Men wh
o received that screening were invited for a second screen 4 years later. P
athology findings from needle biopsy cores were compared for men in both ro
unds. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 4133 men were s
creened in the first round (the prevalence screen), and 2385 were screened
in the second round. The median amount of cancer in needle biopsy sets was
7.0 mm (95 % confidence interval [CII = 5.4 mm to 8.6 mm) in the first roun
d and 4.1 min (95% CI = 2.6 mm to 5.6 mm) in the second round (P =.001). Th
irty-six percent of the adenocarcinomas detected in the first round but onl
y 16% of those detected in the second round had a Gleason score of 7 or hig
her (mean difference = 20% [95% C1 = 10% to 30%]; P < .001). Whereas 25% of
the adenocarcinomas detected in the first round had adverse prognostic fea
tures, only 6 % of those detected in the second round did (mean difference
= 19% [95% CI = 11% to 26%]; P < .001). Baseline PSA values were predictive
for the amount of tumor in biopsies in men with cancer in the first round
but not for that in the second round. Conclusion: Most large prostate cance
rs with high serum PSA levels were effectively detected in a prevalence scr
een. In this population, a screening interval of 4 years appears to be shor
t enough to constrain the development of large tumors, although it is incon
clusive whether this will result in a survival benefit.