Cj. Proctor et al., Modelling antipredator vigilance and flight response in group foragers when warning signals are ambiguous, J THEOR BIO, 211(4), 2001, pp. 409-417
The trade-off between feeding and vigilance in flocks of birds has been ext
ensively studied and modelled. An assumption of many models is that if one
bird spots the predator, it gives a signal and the rest of the flock takes
flight. However, it has been observed that birds do not always respond td s
ignals and in fact many signals turn out to be false alarms. Since taking f
light is both costly in time and energy, it may be advantageous for birds n
ot to respond to all alarm calls. A model is developed to show under what c
ircumstances birds should respond to a signal. The model predicts that unde
r most, but not all, circumstances, birds should respond to multiple detect
ions but not to single detections. The model also predicts that if birds re
spond to all flights, they will have to compensate for the time lost to fee
ding and the greater energy requirement of spending more time in flight, by
being less vigilant, and they have a lower probability of survival than bi
rds which only respond to multiple defections. (C) 2001 Academic Press.