TOWARD TERMINOLOGICAL, CONCEPTUAL, AND STATISTICAL CLARITY IN THE STUDY OF MEDIATORS AND MODERATORS - EXAMPLES FROM THE CHILD-CLINICAL AND PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY LITERATURES

Authors
Citation
Gn. Holmbeck, TOWARD TERMINOLOGICAL, CONCEPTUAL, AND STATISTICAL CLARITY IN THE STUDY OF MEDIATORS AND MODERATORS - EXAMPLES FROM THE CHILD-CLINICAL AND PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY LITERATURES, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 65(4), 1997, pp. 599-610
Citations number
108
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
0022006X
Volume
65
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
599 - 610
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-006X(1997)65:4<599:TTCASC>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Numerous recent attempts to identify mediated and moderated effects in child-clinical and pediatric research on child adjustment have been c haracterized by terminological, conceptual, and statistical inconsiste ncies. To promote greater clarity, the terms mediating and moderating are defined and differentiated. Recommended statistical strategies tha t can be used to test for these effects are reviewed (i.e., multiple r egression and structural equation modeling techniques). The distinctio n between mediated and indirect effects is also discussed. Examples of troublesome and appropriate uses of these terms in the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures are highlighted.