Methodological problems in jury simulation research involve issues of sampl
ing, choice of stimulus materials, appropriate unit of analysis, appropriat
e dependent variable, corroborative data, and problems of role playing. Des
pite these issues, comprehension of jury instructions may be suitable for e
xamination by jury simulation techniques-if certain of these methodological
concerns can be satisfied. In a series of 5 experiments using typical Cana
dian legal instructions on criminal conspiracy and the coconspirator except
ion to the hearsay rule, this study attempted to validate a simple and inex
pensive technique for testing the incomprehensibility of a given set of jur
y instructions by requiring participants to apply those legal instructions
to a set of facts. The results demonstrate the utility of an application te
st, and suggest that for assessing the comprehensibility of jury instructio
ns, it may be acceptable to use undergraduate students as participants, to
use individual participants without group deliberation, and to employ writt
en stimulus materials.