W. Feenstra et al., Can people affected by leprosy at risk of developing plantar ulcers be identified? A field study from central Ethiopia, LEPROSY REV, 72(2), 2001, pp. 151-157
In the ALERT leprosy control programme, 75 people affected by leprosy, in t
hree different geographical areas, were investigated. Each person was docum
ented as having anaesthesia to the 10 g monofilament. The study sought to d
etermine why some people developed ulcers whilst others did not. According
to the records, 43 had an ulcer during the last 5 years but 32 had never ha
d an ulcer. In order to examine protective sensation on the sole of the foo
t, various sensory modalities were tested and the functional anatomy of the
foot was examined. The results showed, as may be expected, that it is not
possible to define a specific threshold for protective sensation that could
be applied to all cases. Some people with only slightly diminished sensati
on developed ulcers, while many others with almost complete anaesthesia rem
ained ulcer-free. In these rural communities, being a fanner reduced the ri
sk of developing an ulcer, but no other demographic features were significa
nt. Graded monofilaments were found to be the most appropriate test, with l
oss of sensation at any of five points tested being a 'positive' result. Th
e 10 g filament was the most sensitive, but only 43% of feet identified by
this test actually developed an ulcer. As people with partial loss of sensa
tion were excluded from this study, this figure may be lower under programm
e conditions. The 50 g and 100 g filaments decrease the number of feet iden
tified as at risk, but increase the percentage which actually develop an ul
cer, to 46% and 49%, respectively. An appropriate test for selecting those
for special programmes which may have a limited capacity, for example the p
rovision of subsidized footwear or involvement in self-care groups, would b
e a 100 g filament, which would detect 86% of those feet likely to develop
an ulcer, while reducing the number of those selected who are not at great
risk. Vibrometry was found to be no better than graded filaments and an exa
mination of functional anatomy did not help in identifying those at risk.