This paper analyzes the discourse conditions governing the choice between e
xtraposition and nonextraposition of that-clause and infinitival-VP subject
s. On the basis of a large corpus of naturally, occurring data, it is shown
that nonextraposition requires that the content of the subject be discours
e-old or directly inferrable. If the content is discourse-new, then extrapo
sition is necessary. The choice between extraposition and nonextraposition
for discourse-old and inferrable subjects is examined and is shown to depen
d on the discourse status of the predicate and on whether it is the predica
te or the subject that links to the following discourse. The paper ends wit
h a discussion of the syntactic position of nonextraposed sentential subjec
ts and concludes that it cannot be the same as that of fronted sentential c
omplements. This means that the common discourse properties of fronting and
nonextraposition must be linked to their common linear ordering properties
, rather than to a common syntactic position.