The results of grain size assessment obtained using computer image analysis
and manually are presented for comparison. Twelve images of austenitic ste
el structures of different grain size were examined. The most important gra
in size parameters, i.e., mean cross section and mean grain diameter were d
etermined. To verify the proposed algorithms the results obtained for the s
ame structures by using classical quantitative metallography are also prese
nted. The algorithms based on significantly different methods for grain edg
e detection were used to demonstrate the relationships more clearly and to
provide a more general view of computer-aided image processing. The measure
ments were also made manually by six independent observers. The comparison
between different methods indicates an advantage of automatic techniques. (
C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.