BACKGROUND. There are difficulties in obtaining health-related qualify of l
ife (HRQL) data from patients with dementia due to variation in their cogni
tive ability, degree of insight and capacity to make judgments. The use of
proxies is one solution.
OBJECTIVES. To examine the infer-rater agreement of patient and proxy compl
etion of the EuroQol EQ-5D instrument (EQ-5D).
RESEARCH DESIGN. The EQ-5D instrument was completed separately by patients,
their caregivers and a physician. Assessment of inter-rater agreement invo
lved comparison of self-completed (patient) and proxy completed (caregiver
and physician) responses for each dimension of EQ-5D; using a weighted kapp
a score. Three key hypotheses were tested. (1) Interrater agreement would b
e stronger between patient and caregiver than between patient and physician
. (2) Interrater agreement would be stronger on the `observable' and object
ive dimensions of EQ-5D. (3) Interrater agreement between patient and proxi
es would be stronger for patients with earlier dementia.
SUBJECTS. The sample comprised 64 patients with a range of dementia severit
y.
MEASURES. The EQ-5D health state classification system and visual analogue
scale were used to assess HRQL. Global severity of dementia was determined
using the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale.
Results. The principal finding of this study was that responses to EQ-5D qu
estions were highly variable across the three raters such that none of the
three hypotheses were strongly supported.
Conclusions. The data provide some support for the use of EQ-5D when interv
iewer administered. However, there are serious concerns regarding the valid
ity of patient self-rated HRQL data obtained in this study and uncertainty
exists regarding who the appropriate proxy should be, as different groups o
f proxies provide different results. It was not clear whether caregivers or
physicians represent better proxies. Further research should focus on the
comparison of caregivers and physicians as proxies.