Objective: To determine the frequency of changes in posterior corneal surfa
ce after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratecto
my (PRK).
Design: Nonrandomized, comparative trial.
Participants: Ninety-five eyes (71 patients) that underwent PRK (n = 45) or
LASIK (n = 50).
Controls: Twenty nonsurgery eyes were used to validate the method of analys
is of the posterior corneal curvature (PCC). Seventy nonsurgery eyes were u
sed for comparisons.
Methods: Float, apex-fixed best fit corneal curvature (ABC), and posterior
elevation difference were evaluated in 20 elevation topography maps at 6 zo
ne diameters (3-7 and 10 mm) and at two time points. Corneal elevation maps
before and after PRK or LASIK were analyzed by the ABC and float methods a
nd compared with a nonsurgery group.
Main Outcome Measures: Posterior corneal curvature change (mm) was classifi
ed as flattening, steepening, or no change.
Results. Flattening of more than 0.12 mm was found in 22.2% of eyes (n = 10
) in the PRK group, a change of +/-0.12 mm was found in 53.3% of eyes (n =
24), and steepening of more than 0.12 mm was found in 24.4% of eyes (n = 11
) using the float method and in 28.9% of eyes (n = 13), 35.6% of eyes (n =
16), and 35.6% eyes (n = 16), respectively, using the ABC method. In the LA
SIK group, the float method registered flattening in 20% of eyes (n = 10),
no change in 52% of eyes (n = 26), and steepening in 28% of eyes (n = 14),
whereas the ABC method registered flattening in 30% of eyes (n = 15), no ch
ange in 40% of eyes (n = 20), and steepening in 30% of eyes (n = 15). The n
onsurgery group showed a similar change in PCC at two different time points
similar to that of the PRK and the LASIK groups.
Conclusions: The differences observed in the PCC after PRK or LASIK were no
t statistically significantly different from those observed over time in th
e nonsurgery control group. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1415-1422 (C) 2001 by th
e American Academy of Ophthalmology.