Comparative radiologic study of bone density and cortical thickness of donor bone used in mandibular reconstruction

Citation
H. Myoung et al., Comparative radiologic study of bone density and cortical thickness of donor bone used in mandibular reconstruction, ORAL SURG O, 92(1), 2001, pp. 23-29
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS
ISSN journal
10792104 → ACNP
Volume
92
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
23 - 29
Database
ISI
SICI code
1079-2104(200107)92:1<23:CRSOBD>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the total cancellous bone d ensity, bone-implant interface density, and cortical thickness of 6 donor b one types commonly used in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Methods. A total of 120 bones from 20 Korean adults-including iliac bones, fibulas, cranial bones, scapulas, ribs, and clavicles-were selected. The im plant recipient site was determined by the shape, contour, and anatomical l imitations of the bones. The serial cross-sectional images of each bone wer e then acquired through computed tomography. Total cancellous bone density, bone-implant interface density around the imaginary implant fixture, and t he cortical thickness along both sides of the imaginary fixture on each cro ss-sectional image were evaluated and compared. Results. The cancellous bone density of each donor bone type had a statisti cally significant difference. The cranial bone showed the highest cancellou s bone density, followed by the iliac bone, clavicle, scapula, rib, and fib ula (P<.05). The bone-implant interface density of the cranial bone, clavic le, fibula, and scapula each belonged to the same Duncan's group, whereas t he rib and iliac bone showed lower bone-implant interface density. In avera ge cortical thickness, the scapula and fibula had a thicker cortex Surround ing the imaginary implant than the other bones, and the rib had the thinnes t cortex. Conclusion. Although more extensive testing is needed to explain the clinic al implications of these results, the findings of this study may help clini cians choose the most appropriate donor bone.