Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures

Citation
G. Heers et Me. Torchia, Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures, ORTHOPADE, 30(6), 2001, pp. 386
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
ORTHOPADE
ISSN journal
00854530 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Database
ISI
SICI code
0085-4530(200106)30:6<386:SHFPHF>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Most fractures of the proximal humerus with significant displacement are be st treated surgically. The range of surgical treatment varies from closed r eduction and pinning to hemiarthroplasty depending on the degree of displac ement, age of the patient, and bone quality. Determining whether or not the individual fractured bone segments are displaced to a significant degree r equires high quality x-rays which can be difficult to obtain from acutely i njured patients. Indications for replacement of the humeral head in acute f ractures include: head splitting fractures in elderly patients, Neer 4-part fracture dislocations, selected 3 part fractures and fracture dislocations in elderly patients with poor bone quality and a very small head fragment, selected severe impression fractures in elderly patients that involve more than 40% to 50% of the articular surface and selected anatomical neck frac tures in which internal fixation is not possible. If a prosthetic replacement of the humeral head is chosen, secure repair of the tuberosities is essential to avoid tuberosity migration and malunion. The clinical results of prosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus for acute fractures are superior to those for late arthroplasty. This treatment modality has been proven to relieve pain. However, even for patients treat ed with primary arthroplasty, a restricted range of motion has to be expect ed postoperatively. Furthermore, several studies indicate that a significan t number of complications can occur following early and late prosthetic rep lacement. Humeral head replacement as a salvage procedure after malunions or failed o pen reduction and internal fixation is technically demanding with a relativ ely high rate of complications. Newer implant designs and instruments may i mprove the clinical results.