Unexpected ICD pulse generator failure due to electronic circuit damage caused by electrical overstress

Citation
Rg. Hauser et al., Unexpected ICD pulse generator failure due to electronic circuit damage caused by electrical overstress, PACE, 24(7), 2001, pp. 1046-1054
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01478389 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1046 - 1054
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-8389(200107)24:7<1046:UIPGFD>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Because it is a lifesaving device, the unexpected failure of an ICD can be catastrophic. We report ICD electronic circuit failure due to electrical ov erstress damage (EOS) to the high voltage hybrid circuit and other electron ic components in a series of ICD pulse generator models. Data were obtained from the Multicenter Registry of Pacemaker and ICD Pacemaker and Lead Fail ures, and from the manufacturers' adverse event reports, that were in the F DA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Of 16 nonbattery Guidant/CPI ICD pulse generator failures reported to the regi stry 6 (38%) have been confirmed by the manufacturer to be EOS related, and Guidant/CPI has reported 273 such failures to the FDA as of 12/29/00. The signs of failure included loss of telemetry and inability to deliver therap y, and some patients have experienced serious adverse events. Hybrid circui t damage may have occurred during capacitor charging or reform, and the maj ority appears to have happened during normal ICD function. While the incide nce of this problem is unknown, a management strategy should be adopted tha t includes routine follow-up every 3 months and device evaluation after a s hock or exposure to external defibrillation or electrosurgical devices. Thi s study suggests that additional data are needed to determine the incidence of this problem, and that our present methods for monitoring the performan ce of ICDs following market release are inadequate.