Contraindicated medications dispensed with cisapride: temporal trends in relation to the sending of 'Dear Doctor' letters

Citation
Lb. Weatherby et al., Contraindicated medications dispensed with cisapride: temporal trends in relation to the sending of 'Dear Doctor' letters, PHARMA D S, 10(3), 2001, pp. 211-218
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
ISSN journal
10538569 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
211 - 218
Database
ISI
SICI code
1053-8569(200105)10:3<211:CMDWCT>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Purpose 'Dear Doctor' letters alert the prescribing community of drug label ing changes that contain new contraindications, warnings, adverse reactions , and precautions. There has been little assessment of the impact of these letters. We quantified the impact of two 'Dear Doctor' letters concerning i nteractions between cisapride and a series of drugs. A letter in 1995 descr ibed a risk of prolonged QT intervals and serious ventricular arrhythmia in patients who received macrolide antibiotics and imidazole antifungals in c onjunction with cisapride. A June 1998 letter that expanded the list of con traindicated comedications had wider distribution than an earlier one, was accompanied by substantial Internet and media coverage, and was complemente d by an effort to inform large pharmacy dispensing information organization s of the warnings against concurrent use of the named drugs. Methods Health plan members with one or more outpatient pharmacy claims for cisapride during the period I January 1995 through 31 May 1999 were identi fied among members of a large New England health insurer. A retrospective r eview of concurrent and nearly concurrent dispensings of cisapride and cont raindicated comedications was undertaken in the automated pharmacy claims d ata using both graphical and statistical time-series analysis. We tabulated by month the fraction of cisapride dispensings that occurred in close temp oral relation to dispensings of contraindicated comedications. Codispensing s that occurred on the same day were taken as the most direct measure of pr escriber responsiveness to the letters. Codispensings that occurred in wind ows of plus or minus 2 weeks (29 day window) and plus or minus 4 weeks (57 day window) were taken as measures of possible simultaneous consumption. Am ong overlapping dispensings, we counted the proportion dispensed by the sam e pharmacy. Time series regression analysis of secular, seasonal, and step- effects was conducted. Results There was a steady decline in codispensing of cisapride and contrai ndicated medicines, and a pronounced seasonal effect, arising principally f rom the seasonal use of macrolide antibiotics. Against this background, the isolated Dear Doctor letter of October 1995 had no discernible effect on p rescribing practices. The 1998 letter and surrounding activity, by contrast , were followed by a 66% decline in same-day dispensings and a smaller, but still pronounced decline in dispensings in the wider time windows. For mos t codispensings of contraindicated medications with cisapride, both medicat ions came from the same pharmacy. Conclusions Publicity and direct intervention with dispensing pharmacies ma y be an important supplement to Dear Doctor letters when the goal is to eli minate the codispensing of drugs that should not be taken together.