It has long been known that severe food deprivation disrupts the estrous cy
cle. One of the main problems with behavioral tasks that use food for reinf
orcement is the requirement that the animal be food deprived. This manipula
tion could be problematic in studies using female animals, since it may int
erfere with the estrous cycle of the animals. The purpose of the present st
udy was to investigate: (1) the effect of mild food deprivation on four dif
ferent strains of rats, (2) factors in the food deprivation procedure that
could affect the estrous cycle, and (3) the possible effect of enriched die
ts during food deprivation on the estrous cycle. A comparison of the estrou
s cycle in four different rat strains revealed differences in the reliabili
ty of the estrous cycle even before the onset of food deprivation. Fischer,
Long-Evans, and Sprague-Dawley rats all showed reliable cycle patterns. Th
is was not the case for Brown Norway rats. During food deprivation, the cyc
le of the Fischer rats was disrupted, whereas the Long-Evans and Sprague-Da
wley animals continued to cycle. Both the rate of weight loss and the perce
nt of ad libitum body weight were related to cessation of the estrous cycle
. However, enriching an animal's diet with sugar or oil additives delayed t
he disruption of the estrous cycle. Additionally, animals resumed cycling w
hen returned to ad libitum weight levels. The present findings suggest that
when animals need to be food deprived, preference should be given to using
Long-Evans or Sprague-Dawley rats. If Fischer rats must be used, they shou
ld not be deprived below 90-95% of their ad libitum body weight. Strategies
for future food deprivation studies are discussed, as well as a comparison
of the effects of mild and severe food deprivation. (C) 2001 Elsevier Scie
nce Inc. All rights reserved.