Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status

Citation
Bj. Tepper et al., Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status, PHYSL BEHAV, 73(4), 2001, pp. 571-577
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
ISSN journal
00319384 → ACNP
Volume
73
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
571 - 577
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9384(200107)73:4<571:DOBMTC>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop brief methods for classifying indi viduals by genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Two me thods are described, which are modifications of a commonly used, suprathres hold procedure. Eighty-nine adult subjects rated the perceived intensity of solutions of 0.032, 0.32 and 3.2 mmol/l PROP and 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 mol/l sodi um chloride (NaCl) (three-solution test), as well as solutions of 0.32 mmol /l PROP and 0.1 mol/l NaCl (one-solution test) using the Labeled Magnitude Scale (LMS). Subjects were classified as PROP nontasters (n = 22), medium t asters (n = 51) or supertasters (n = 16) by the three-solution test. Taster status was independently determined by the one-solution test using numeric al cutoff scores, which were determined by calculating the +/- 95% confiden ce interval around the group means for PROP taste intensity. Supertasters g ave PROP a rating of greater than or equal to 51 ("very strong" on the LMS) and nontasters gave PROP a rating of less than or equal to 15.5 (approxima tely "moderate" on the LMS). Medium tasters fell between these two limits. Ninety-one percent of nontasters, 82% of medium tasters and 89% of supertas ters were classified in a similar way by the two methods. Agreement between methods was high [coefficient of association (P) = 0.74; P less than or eq ual to .00 1]. These data suggest that three- and one-solution methods can reliably classify subjects by taste sensitivity to PROP and could provide v aluable tools in population-based studies. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. A ll tights reserved.