Recent advances in agricultural biotechnology have produced many new crop v
arieties with valuable transgenic traits. These varieties are being, and wi
ll continue to be, marketed alongside conventional nontransgenic varieties.
As a result, seed purity in commercial seed lots is of particular importan
ce to both seed consumers and seed producers. A key step in the seed produc
tion process is the design of sampling and testing procedures used to evalu
ate seed lot purity. However, due to uncertainties in such methods, there i
s always a risk of incorrectly rejecting or accepting a seed lot. This pape
r discusses factors that should be considered when designing and implementi
ng seed purity testing procedures to manage this misclassification risk - e
specially with regard to the presence or absence of transgenic traits. Many
sources of uncertainty in both seed lot sampling and in the assay methods
are described, and recommendations for reducing their impact are provided.
This paper also explains the statistical concepts of misclassification risk
as it affects seed producers and seed consumers. Sampling plans and formul
as for determining the sample sizes necessary to control these misclassific
ation errors when accepting or rejecting seed lots are also provided. Both
simple, single-stage testing plans and the, often more efficient, double-st
age testing plans are described. Testing seed pools rather than individual
seeds is introduced as another way of adding efficiency to the testing proc
ess. Formulas are given for determining, from a seed sample, the confidence
limits for the actual purity level of a commercial lot.