Kl. Wilson et al., Social rules for managing attempted interpersonal domination in the workplace: Influence of status and gender, SEX ROLES, 44(3-4), 2001, pp. 129-154
The present study utilized a social rules approach to investigate the relat
ive influence of gender and status on managers' self-evaluations of their e
ffectiveness in handling a dominating subordinate. In the first study 84 Wh
ite middle-class participants identified the prescriptive and proscriptive
rules for socially appropriate responding to a stimulus situation involving
a pushy subordinate. Four rule sets were identified for female and male ma
nagers and subordinates, respectively. Rule-sets shared a number of common
rules and showed some variation according to gender roles. In the second st
udy, 91 White middle-class participants rated the individual rules for impo
rtance and also rated their personal and managerial effectiveness when resp
onding to the stimulus situation using gender- and status-consistent and ge
nder-and status-inconsistent response strategies. Both men and women rated
the female gender and status- consistent strategy as most effective, and ra
ted the status-inconsistent strategy as less effective than a gender-incons
istent response. Results were interpreted as providing more support for a s
ituational gender-related theory of workplace behavior, rather than a tradi
tional gender role perspective.