Modification of syphilitic genital ulcer manifestations by coexistent HIV infection

Citation
Am. Rompalo et al., Modification of syphilitic genital ulcer manifestations by coexistent HIV infection, SEX TRA DIS, 28(8), 2001, pp. 448-454
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease","da verificare
Journal title
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
ISSN journal
01485717 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
448 - 454
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-5717(200108)28:8<448:MOSGUM>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Background. Conflicting data exist regarding whether HIV infection leads to changes in the clinical manifestations and severity of genital ulcer disea se (GUD). Goal. To determine the impact of HIV on the etiology and clinical severity of GUD. Study Design: From July 1990 to July 1992, consecutive patients presenting to the two Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) Sexually Transmitted Dis eases clinics were approached as candidates for enrollment in a prospective study to determine factors associated with the transmission and acquisitio n of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Results: Of the 1368 patients who presented to the BCHD, 214 (16%) had geni tal ulcerations: 160 (21%) of 757 men and 54 (9%) of 611 women. Among the p atients with GUD who had undergone HIV testing, 28 (14%) of 204 were infect ed with HIV: 25 (17%) of 151 men and 3 (6%) of 53 women. Although both grou ps-those infected with HIV and those not infected with HIV-presented with G UD of similar duration (10 versus 11 days; P = 0.17), multiple lesions were found more frequently in men with HIV infection than in uninfected men: 87 % versus 62% (P = 0.02). Although not statistically significant, GUD in men with HIV infection more often were deep (64% versus 44%, respectively) rat her than superficial (36% versus 57%, respectively; P = 0.08), and larger ( 505 mm(2) versus 109 mm(2); P = 0.06). Primary syphilis caused more GUD amo ng men with HIV infection than among uninfected men: 9 (36%) of 25 versus 2 4 (19%) of 126, respectively (P < 0.01). Secondary syphilis was diagnosed w ith concomitant GUD more frequently among men with HIV infection than among uninfected men: 3 (13%) of 25 versus 3 (2%) of 123, respectively (P < 0.01 ). Conclusions: In this study, patients who presented with GUD were more likel y to be infected with HIV. A higher proportion of men with HIV infection ha d multiple lesions, and the lesions were more likely to be caused by syphil is.