Meta-analyses are being undertaken in an increasing diversity of diseases a
nd conditions, some of which involve outcomes measured on an ordered catego
rical scale. We consider methodology for undertaking a meta-analysis on ind
ividual patient data for an ordinal response. The approach is based on the
proportional odds model, in which the treatment effect is represented by th
e log-odds ratio. A general framework is proposed for fixed and random effe
ct models. Tests of the validity of the various assumptions made in the met
a-analysis models, such as a global test of the assumption of proportional
odds between treatments, are presented. The combination of studies with dif
ferent definitions or numbers of response categories is discussed. The meth
ods are illustrated on two data sets, in a classical framework using SAS an
d MLn and in a Bayesian framework using BUGS. The relative merits of the th
ree software packages for such meta-analyses are discussed. Copyright (C) 2
001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.