Screening mammographies in Switzerland: what makes female and male physicians prescribe them?

Citation
B. Keller et al., Screening mammographies in Switzerland: what makes female and male physicians prescribe them?, SWISS MED W, 131(21-22), 2001, pp. 311-319
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY
ISSN journal
14247860 → ACNP
Volume
131
Issue
21-22
Year of publication
2001
Pages
311 - 319
Database
ISI
SICI code
1424-7860(20010602)131:21-22<311:SMISWM>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Question understudy: Physicians play a key role in motivating women to unde rgo mammography screening. In 1998 we assessed Swiss physicians' attitudes to mammography screening and their prescription behaviour in this regard. Methods: All female physicians and every second male physician aged 50-69 w ho were either not board-certified or board-certified in general practice, internal medicine, or obstetrics/gynaecology were sent a questionnaire. The response rate was 50% and thus 738 questionnaires were included in this st udy. Of the study population 39% were female and 6t% male physicians. The d istribution of professional backgrounds was: 27% board-certified general pr actitioners; 23% board-certified internists; 11% board-certified gynaecolog ists; 39% not board-certified. Results: 55% of all study participants were in favour of a mammography scre ening programme for women aged over 50 in Switzerland, but breast self-exam ination and clinical breast examination were judged to have a more positive impact on breast cancer survival. Among clinically practising physicians, 22% reported generally prescribing biannual screening mammographics for wom en aged 50-69. Irrespective of other determinants, physicians from the Ital ian- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland prescribed screening mammogra phies more often than their colleagues from the German-speaking part (odds ratio [OR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-4.2). Clinical practice in obstetrics/gynaecolopy, (OR 2.4; CI 1.3-4.2) and a self-reported high leve l of knowledge concerning mammography screening (OR 1.9; CI 1.1-3.2) were a lso positively associated with the prescription of screening mammography. Conclusions: Since mammography screening programmes exist in only three Fre nch-speaking cantons of Switzerland (VS; VD; GE), the gap in prescription o f screening mammographies between French/Italian- and German-speaking regio ns must be narrowed to prevent a higher prevalence of side effects front op portunistic screening among German-speaking women. There isa need to educat e physicians and the political community regarding the risks and benefits o f mammography screening.