Our examination of a number of widely used methodology texts in psychology
revealed that they present a narrow conception of science that fails to rec
ognize major changes in the understanding of science that have occurred sin
ce 1960. Such changes include an emphasis on explanation, theoretical promi
se and scientific importance, and the difficulties associated with hypothes
is testing. Because these texts provide the primary source of science educa
tion for psychology students, they poorly prepare students for dealing with
contemporary science. In this article, we detail the inadequacies of curre
nt methodological texts with respect to their treatment of science and desc
ribe a more currently acceptable conception of science. We provide instruct
ors with recommendations for improving the science education of psychology
students.