Estimating potential impacts of a change in river quality on the tourism value of Kruger National Park: An application of travel cost, contingent andconjoint valuation methods
J. Turpie et A. Joubert, Estimating potential impacts of a change in river quality on the tourism value of Kruger National Park: An application of travel cost, contingent andconjoint valuation methods, WATER SA, 27(3), 2001, pp. 387-398
Development and resource allocation decision processes are increasingly und
er pressure to take environmental values into account in order to reach opt
imal economic outcomes. In South Africa new techniques will be needed to in
corporate environmental values into environmental impact assessment and in
the allocation of water resources under the new National Water Act (1908),
both of which require the comparison of alternative scenarios with varying
impacts on the environment, This study on the tourism value of rivers in-th
e Crocodile Catchment is the first case study to develop methods for incorp
orating the economic values of the goods and services provided by functioni
ng aquatic ecosystems into such decision processes. Rivers within the Kruge
r National Park (KNP) will be affected by water usage in the portions of th
eir catchment areas upstream of the park boundary. The current tourism valu
e of these rivers was considered in terms of revenues to KNP (visitors' on-
site expenditure), contribution to the economy (visitors' on-site and off-s
ite expenditure) and recreational value, including consumers' surplus. The
effect of a change in river quality was determined using a joint contingent
valuation - conjoint valuation approach, whereby respondents rated four di
fferent scenarios, each containing four attributes at four different levels
. It was estimated that the current value of KNP tourism is about R136 m. i
n terms of on-site expenditure, R267 in. in terms of economic impact, or al
l expenditure related to visiting the park, and R1 bn in terms; of consumer
s' surplus, The latter two values can be added to calculate total recreatio
nal value. Four methods were used to isolate the value of rivers front the
total tourism value stated above, and all yielded similar values of about 3
0% of the total. This implies that about 30% of tourism business would be l
ost if rivers were totally degraded. Thus, rivers within the Crocodile Catc
hment, which takes 22% of KNP visitor-nights, contribute R9 in. to KNP reve
nues and have a total annual recreational use value of about R85 ro., inclu
ding off-site expenditure and consumers' surplus. The conjoint analysis gen
erated an equation which is able to predict the change in trip expenditure,
or total KNP revenue, associated with changes in levels of any of the four
attributes considered. Appearance of the riverscape has the greatest influ
ence on recreational use value, followed by waterbird diversity, aquatic me
gafauna and riparian tree density. Such models can be used in water allocat
ion decision processes when attribute levels associated with alternative ma
nagement scenarios are predicted by aquatic ecologists.