The response of three water delivery schedules, representing various levels
of flexibility, on crop production, water saving, soil salinization, drain
age volumes and watertable behavior was examined. A physical-based transien
t soil water and solute transfer model, Soil-Water-Atmosphere-Plant (SWAP),
was used as a tool. The evaluations were made for un-restricted and restri
cted water supply situations considering three different watertable conditi
ons prevailing in the fourth drainage project (FDP) of the Punjab, Pakistan
. From the simulation results it is apparent that on average the effect of
irrigation schedule flexibility on crop yields is not very significant. How
ever, compared to a fixed schedule provided un-restricted canal water suppl
ies are available, the Productivity of irrigation water supply (Y-act/I-IT)
, is up to 30% higher for the on-demand schedule. The on-demand schedule ca
pable of complying with the temporal variations in climate is also more eff
ective in water saving, reducing drainage volumes and controlling rising wa
ter-tables if fanners follow guidelines and do not over-irrigate. In the pr
esent water deficient environment of the Indus basin, the benefits of the o
n-demand schedule and a fixed schedule are comparable. In the absence of su
fficient canal water supplies, infrastructure and a well-designed and effec
tive monitoring and communication system, moving towards the on-demand syst
em will be un-productive. For the longterm sustainability of the irrigation
system, improvements in the performance of the present water allocations a
nd on-farm water management practices seems to be more necessary. (C) 2001
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.