Dual-site atrial pacing for atrial fibrillation in patients without bradycardia

Citation
Cp. Lau et al., Dual-site atrial pacing for atrial fibrillation in patients without bradycardia, AM J CARD, 88(4), 2001, pp. 371-375
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029149 → ACNP
Volume
88
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
371 - 375
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9149(20010815)88:4<371:DAPFAF>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Atrial pacing has been shown to delay the onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) when compared with ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome . The role for pacing in the control of AF in patients without bradycardia is uncertain. We performed a randomized, crossover, single-blinded study in 22 patients (14 women, aged 63 +/- 10 years) with paroxysmal AF refractory to treatment with oral sotalol (202 +/- 68 mg/day) and no bradycardic indi cation for pacing. All patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker with 2 at rial pacing leads positioned at the high right atrium and coronary sinus os tium, respectively. Patients were randomized in a crossover fashion to be p aced for 12 weeks, either with high right atrial (RA) pacing at 30 beats/mi n ("Off") or dual-site RA pacing with an overdrive algorithm that maintaine d atrial pacing at a rate slightly above the sinus rate ("On"). Treatment o n resulted in a significantly higher percentage of atrial pacing and a redu ction in atrial ectopic frequency than the treatment off period. The time t o the first clinical AF recurrence was prolonged (15 +/- 17 to 50 +/- 35 da ys, p = 0.006), and total AF burden was reduced (45 +/- 34% vs 22 +/- 29%, p = 0.04) in the on-treatment phase. However, there was no difference in AF checklist symptom scores or overall quality-of-life measures. Dual-site RA pacing with continued sinus overdrive prolonged the time to AF recurrence and decreased AF burden in patients with paroxysmal AF. The absence of a ma jor impact on symptom control suggests that pacing should be used as an adj unctive therapy with other treatment modalities for AF. (C) 2001 by Excerpt a Medica, Inc.