The effect of different definitions of a patient on immunization assessment

Citation
Me. O'Connor et al., The effect of different definitions of a patient on immunization assessment, AM J PUB HE, 91(8), 2001, pp. 1273-1275
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ISSN journal
00900036 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1273 - 1275
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-0036(200108)91:8<1273:TEODDO>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Objectives. In this report, the authors compare immunization assessment usi ng 2 definitions of a patient. Methods. Two Clinical Assessment Software Application (CASA) assessments we re performed. The first sampled 200 two-year-olds seen at least once since birth. The second sampled 200 two-year-olds seen in the previous year. Chil dren with incomplete immunizations in the first sample were contacted. Results. In the second sample, 72% of children had complete immunizations, compared with 46% in the first sample. In the first sample, 78% of children with incomplete immunizations had not been seen during the past year. Of 1 34 children in the first sample seen in the past year or successfully conta cted, 75% had complete immunizations. Conclusions. The CASA assessment's definition of a patient underestimates i mmunization rates.