Paradigm lost: Race, ethnicity, and the search for a new population taxonomy

Authors
Citation
Gm. Oppenheimer, Paradigm lost: Race, ethnicity, and the search for a new population taxonomy, AM J PUB HE, 91(7), 2001, pp. 1049-1055
Citations number
82
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ISSN journal
00900036 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1049 - 1055
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-0036(200107)91:7<1049:PLREAT>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently recommended that the National Inst itutes of Health (NTH) reevaluate its employment of "race," a concept lacki ng scientific or anthropological justification, in cancer surveillance and other population research. The IOM advised the NIH to use a different popul ation classification, that of "ethnic group" instead of "race." A relativel y new term, according to the IOM, "ethnic group" would turn research attent ion away from biological determinism and toward a focus on culture and beha vior. This article examines the historically central role of racial categorizatio n and its relationship to racism in the United States and questions whether dropping "race" from population taxonomies is either possible or, at least in the short run, preferable. In addition, a historical examination of "et hnicity" and " ethnic group" finds that these concepts, as used in the Unit ed States, derive in part from race and immigration and are not neutral ter ms; instead, they carry their own burden of political, social, and ideologi cal meaning.