The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently recommended that the National Inst
itutes of Health (NTH) reevaluate its employment of "race," a concept lacki
ng scientific or anthropological justification, in cancer surveillance and
other population research. The IOM advised the NIH to use a different popul
ation classification, that of "ethnic group" instead of "race." A relativel
y new term, according to the IOM, "ethnic group" would turn research attent
ion away from biological determinism and toward a focus on culture and beha
vior.
This article examines the historically central role of racial categorizatio
n and its relationship to racism in the United States and questions whether
dropping "race" from population taxonomies is either possible or, at least
in the short run, preferable. In addition, a historical examination of "et
hnicity" and " ethnic group" finds that these concepts, as used in the Unit
ed States, derive in part from race and immigration and are not neutral ter
ms; instead, they carry their own burden of political, social, and ideologi
cal meaning.