Several serum and urine biochemical markers of bone resorption and formatio
n have been developed. Biochemical bone markers have been used as intermedi
ate end-points in all major studies of anti-osteoporotic therapies. Bone re
sorption markers, in particular, may add an independent, predictive value t
o the assessment of bone loss and fracture risk. There are also potential a
dvantages in monitoring anti-osteoporotic treatment in the short-term in ad
dition to bone densitometry, to rapidly identify non-responders to therapy,
or non-compliance. Despite these recent advances, until now bone markers h
ave simply been very useful research tools, with their clinical utility bei
ng limited by intra-individual and diurnal variability. However, the probab
ility of the true bone mineral density response to hormone replacement ther
apy for the individual patient may be predicted using algorithms based on a
spectrum of cut-off bone marker levels with varying false positive and neg
ative rates. Thus, the transition of biochemical bone markers into everyday
clinical practice may be rapidly approaching.