A recent study claimed that a larger proportion or breast cancer was due to
environmental exposures than to hereditary factors. This controversial pub
lication clearly indicates the essential importance of investigating the ge
ne-environment interaction and having a clear idea of what are the essentia
l environmental factors to investigate. Environmental exposures are a subje
ct of current interest in breast cancer aetiology and two common issues are
exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and certain pesticides, fungicid
es and their residues. Overall. there does not appear to be an identifiable
increased risk associated with domestic exposure to EMF, although there is
a need for good studies with direct estimates of exposure. Oestrogens from
a variety of sources. including chemical exposures, are determinant in bre
ast cancer risk in women. Attention has recently increasingly focused on en
vironmental exposures and environmental chemical pollutants as risk factors
for breast cancer. The common nature of breast cancer in women., and such
exposures, make such an association plausible, although far from proven as
causal. Given also the resistant nature of concentrations in adipose tissue
, it is important to attempt to identify any risk resulting from this expos
ure. Based on current evidence, the risk of breast cancer associated with e
xposure to organochlorine pesticides and their residues appears to be small
, if it exists at all. However. one caveat is that the effect of individual
or groups of PCBs as risk factors for breast cancer merits some further in
vestigation. Indeed, a clear and powerful message which comes from recent w
ork is that great care and attention must be given to any statistical analy
sis of such chemical exposures given the potential for collinearity which e
xists between the various chemical compounds and their congeners. (C) 2001
Harcourt Publishers Ltd.