Excess breast cancer risk and the role of parity, age at first childbirth and exposure to radiation in infancy

Citation
E. Holmberg et al., Excess breast cancer risk and the role of parity, age at first childbirth and exposure to radiation in infancy, BR J CANC, 85(3), 2001, pp. 362-366
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN journal
00070920 → ACNP
Volume
85
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
362 - 366
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0920(20010803)85:3<362:EBCRAT>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Exposure to ionizing radiation is a known risk factor for breast cancer and the fertility pattern is a recognized modifier of breast cancer risk, The aim of this study was to elucidate the interaction between these 2 factors. This study is based on a Swedish cohort of 17 202 women who had been irrad iated for skin haemangiomas in infancy between 1920 and 1965. The mean age at treatment was 6 months and the median breast dose was 0.05 Gy (range 0-3 5.8 Gy). Follow-up information on vital status, parity, age at first childb irth and breast cancer incidence was retrieved through record linkage with national population registers for the period 1958-1995. Analyses of excess relative risk (ERR) models were performed using Poisson regression methods. In this cohort, the fertility pattern differed from that in the Swedish po pulation, with significantly fewer childbirths overall and before 25 years of age but more childbirth after that age. There were 307 breast cancers in the cohort and the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.22 (95% Cl 1.0 9-1.36). A linear dose-response model with stratification for fertility pat tern and menopausal status resulted in the best fit of the data. ERR/Gy was 0.33 (95% Cl 0.17-0.53). In absolute terms this means an excess of 2.1 and 5.4 cases per Gy per 104 breast-years in the age groups 40-49 and 50-59 ye ars respectively. The fertility pattern influenced the breast cancer risk i n this irradiated population in a similar way to that observed in other stu dies. SIR at dose = 0 was highest, 2.31, among postmenopausal nulliparous w omen (95% Cl 1.48-3.40, n = 62). SIR at dose = 0 was lowest in pre- or post menopausal women with a first childbirth before 25 years of age; 0.89 (0.71 -1.09) and 0.88 (0.58-1.25) respectively. Thus, in addition to the dose-eff ect response in the cohort, part of the breast cancer excess could be expla ined by a different fertility pattern. The estimates of ERR/Gy for the vari ous categories of age at first childbirth, number of children, menopausal s tatus and ovarian dose were very similar, contradicting any interaction eff ects on the scale of relative risk. (C) 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.