A quasi-randomised controlled trial of water as a quick softening agent ofpersistent earwax in general practice

Citation
Jah. Eekhof et al., A quasi-randomised controlled trial of water as a quick softening agent ofpersistent earwax in general practice, BR J GEN PR, 51(469), 2001, pp. 635-637
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
ISSN journal
09601643 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
469
Year of publication
2001
Pages
635 - 637
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-1643(200108)51:469<635:AQCTOW>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Background. Earwax is a common problem in general practice, The incidence o f complaints owing to earwax in general practice in the Netherlands is 39.3 per 1000 patients. Aim: To determine the feasibility of a strategy using water as a,for persis tent earwax, compared with the usual quick dispersant strategy using oil as a dispersant for three days in a general practice setting. Design of study. Practice based, prospective controlled intervention study, Setting.. Forty-two patients (59 ears) in four general practices in the Net herlands. Method. Patients with persistent earwax were randomised into an interventio n group and a control group. For patients in the intervention group, water drops at body temperature were dropped into the impacted ear and the audito ry meatus was blocked with a wet wad of cotton, After the patient had waite d for 15 minutes in the waiting room a series of attempts at syringing was completed. Patients in the control group received the usual strategy and we re instructed to soften the earwax with oil each night before sleeping and to block the auditory meatus with a wad of cotton, for three days. They wer e asked to come back after three days for the second attempt of syringing. For both strategies the mean number of syringing attempts (and 95% confiden ce interval) was calculated and compared by testing the difference between the means using a t-test for independent samples. All ears in which the wax was still persistent after another five syringing attempts were given the value of 6 in the calculations. Results. The mean number of syringing attempts needed per patient in the in tervention group was 3.0 (95% CI = 2.4 to 3.6) and for the control group, t he mean was 2.4 (95% CI = 1.7 to 3.1). The difference between means (0.6, 9 5% CI = 0.3 to 1.5) was not statistically significant (P = 0.18). Conclusion. A patient with persistent earwax can stay in the waiting room f ollowing the initial series of five attempts at syringing, with water insti lled in the ear canal, After 15 minutes, the earwax is removed as easily as in the usual strategy using oil,for three days. The strategy using water a s a dispersant instilled for persistent earwax is quick and more convenient for the patient.