Prospective analysis of relationships of outcome measures for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

Citation
R. Midha et al., Prospective analysis of relationships of outcome measures for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, CAN J NEUR, 28(3), 2001, pp. 239-244
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
ISSN journal
03171671 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
239 - 244
Database
ISI
SICI code
0317-1671(200108)28:3<239:PAOROO>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Background. We undertook a prospective study to investigate relationships b etween outcome measures of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Methods: Thirty-o ne patients (mean age 52.6, range 20-80), with clinically and electrically verified ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, were seen independently by a neuros urgeon and a physiotherapist. All tests were administered to all patients o n each visit. Data collected included measures of sensory (monofilament, tw o-point discrimination, vibration) and motor function (grip, key-pinch, mus cle atrophy), pain (visual analogue scale (VAS)) and impact on lifestyle (L evine's questionnaires (function status score - FSS, symptom severity score - SSS)), disability of the arm, shoulder and hand module (DASH) and patien t-specific measures (PSM). Parametric and non-parametric correlation and fa ctor analysis were done. Results: Outcome analysis was available for 63 pat ient visits, with follow-up obtained for 20 patients (mean 8.5 months). Lif estyle and pain instruments (FSS, SSS, DASH, PSM and VAS) all correlated we ll with each other (r > 0.6, p < .01). DASH was moderately to highly correl ated to nine of the 11 measures. Some tests correlated poorly, for example, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament with other sensory measures and muscle atrop hy with almost all measures. Factor analysis revealed that there are two pr incipal factors, accounting for 77% of the variance. Factor 1 relates to im pact on lifestyle and pain while Factor 2 relates to strength and function. Discussion/Conclusions: Intraclass measures, particularly ones assessing l ifestyle and pain instruments are strongly correlated. Factor analysis reve aled two principal factors that account for the majority of the variance; f uture studies with a larger sample size are needed to validate this analysi s.