Physicians' accuracy and interrator reliability for the diagnosis of unstable meniscal tears in patients having osteoarthritis of the knee

Citation
Gf. Dervin et al., Physicians' accuracy and interrator reliability for the diagnosis of unstable meniscal tears in patients having osteoarthritis of the knee, CAN J SURG, 44(4), 2001, pp. 267-274
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
0008428X → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
267 - 274
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-428X(200108)44:4<267:PAAIRF>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Objective: To determine clinicians' accuracy and reliability for the clinic al diagnosis of unstable meniscus tears in patients with symptomatic osteoa rthritis of the knee. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: A single tertiary care centre. Patients: One hundred and fifty-two patients with sy mptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee refractory to conservative medical tre atment were selected for prospective evaluation of arthroscopic debridement . Intervention: Arthroscopic debridement of the knee, including meniscal te ar and chondral flap resection, without abrasion arthroplasty. Outcome meas ures: A standardized assessment protocol was administered to each patient b y 2 independent observers. Arthroscopic determination of unstable meniscal tears was recorded by 1 observer who reviewed a video, recording and was bl inded to preoperative data. Those variables that had the highest interobser ver agreement and the strongest association with meniscal tear by univariat e methods were entered into logistic regression to model the best predictio n of resectable tears. Results: There were 92 meniscal tears (77 medial, 15 lateral). Interobserver agreement between clinical fellows and treating su rgeons was poor to fair (kappa < 0.4) for all clinical variables except rad iographic measures, which were good. Fellows and surgeons predicted unstabl e meniscal tear preoperatively with equivalent accuracy of 60%. Logistic re gression modelling revealed that a history of swelling and a ballottable ef fusion were negative predictors. A positive McMurray test was the only posi tive predictor of unstable meniscal tear. "Mechanical" sym toms were not re liable predictors in this prospective study. The model was 69% accurate for all patients and 76% for those with advanced medial compartment osteoarthr itis defined by a joint space height of 2 mm or less. Conclusions: This stu dy underscored the difficulty in using clinical variables to predict unstab le medial meniscal tears in patients with pre-existing osteoarthritis of th e knee. The lack of interobserver agreement must be overcome to ensure that the findings can be generalized to other physician observers.