An inverse association has been observed between dietary intake of lycopene
and the risk of prostate cancer. We investigated the effects of lycopene s
upplementation in patients with prostate cancer. Twenty-six men with newly
diagnosed, clinically localized (14 T-1 and 12 T-2) prostate cancer were ra
ndomly assigned to receive 15 mg of lycopene (n = 15) twice daily or no sup
plementation (n 11) for 3 weeks before radical prostatectomy. Biomarkers of
differentiation and apoptosis were assessed by Western blot analysis on be
nign and malignant parts of the prostate gland. Prostatectomy specimens wer
e entirely embedded, step-sectioned, and evaluated for pathological stage,
Gleason score, volume of cancer, and extent of high-grade prostatic intraep
ithelial neoplasia. Plasma levels of lycopene, insulin-like growth factor-1
(IGF-1), IGF binding protein-3, and prostate-specific antigen were measure
d at baseline and after 3 weeks of supplementation or observation. Eleven (
73%) subjects in the intervention group and two (18%) subjects in the contr
ol group had no involvement of surgical margins and/or extra-prostatic tiss
ues with cancer (P = 0.02). Twelve (84%) subjects in the lycopene group and
five (45%) subjects in the control group had tumors <4 ml in size (P = 0.2
2). Diffuse involvement of the prostate by high-grade prostatic intraepithe
lial neoplasia was present in 10 (67%) subjects in the intervention group a
nd in 11 (100%) subjects in the control group (P = 0.05). Plasma prostate-s
pecific antigen levels decreased by 18% in the intervention group, whereas
they increased by 14% in the control group (P = 0.25). Expression of connex
in 43 in cancerous prostate tissue was 0.63 +/- 0.19 absorbance in the lyco
pene group compared with 0.25 +/- 0.08 in the control group (P = 0.13). Exp
ression of bcl-2 and bax did not differ significantly between the two study
groups. IGF-I levels decreased in both groups (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0003,
respectively). The results suggest that lycopene supplementation may decrea
se the growth of prostate cancer. However, no firm conclusions can be drawn
at this time because of the small sample size.